cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of ‘non-google’ approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

Edit: had to change the title, originally it said Uber too but I cannot find back to the source of ether that’s true or not…

  • ouch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Google has ruined Android by closing it up.

    EU needs to step in and force Google to open it up.

    While at it, go for Apple’s monopoly as well.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I swear I am so close to jumping into the void of mainline linux on phones.

    The only main issue is device drivers, but I would be fine happily extracting them from android or making new ones. Modern Android is a complete full stack POS.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Seems like my time to move away from Authy. Any drop in alternative for iOS? Ideally I could export services and load them back, not manually adding/removing 1 by 1. Even if I can’t though, suggestion still welcomed.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Oh great, I guess I’ll have to change my payment info for everything now. Fantastic.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Authy has been utter garbage for a long time and if you ever needed a reason to migrate away then now is as good as ever.

  • Roopappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why would anyone load an app from McDonalds? You want to give them elevated access to your most personal data for a few dollars of coupons?

    What are they taking from you that’s worth more than the discounts they are giving you? Because they are definitely making a profit, or they wouldn’t be doing it.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We are definitely in the era where people think discounts before user privacy. I bet most of people downloading the Mcdonald app do it exactly because of cheeper prices and easy of access.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This makes me want to use GrapheneOS more. If the dataminers don’t want you to use it then it must be doing something right.

  • SnotBubble@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Would not updating Revolut keep the app compatible as long as you don’t sign out?

    If so, don’t update the app and write down the build number of the last app version which worked on GrapheneOS. That way you would have a bit more time to sort things out.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It always seems that with finance we take 2 steps forward and 1 step back. That’s why Bitcoin will never stop existing.

  • zako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    the problem here is not the banks or apps, the problem is Google Play Integrity API, which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones and it is used to ban secured ROMs such as GrapheneOS and it allows to run apps on outdated phones without security patches.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones

      The point of the Google Play Integrity API is to ensure that the user is not in control of their phone, but that one of a small number of megacorps are in control.

      Can the user pull their data out of apps? Not acceptable. Can the user access the app file itself? Not acceptable. Can the user modify apps? Not acceptable.

      Basically it ensures that the user has no control over their own computing.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s simply the “secure” isn’t meant for users but the cooperations. Make it “secure” to their business.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s used to help secure the businesses app yes. It helps with things like preventing resource abuse which would cost the company money. E.g. querying mass amounts of data on a loop to increase the companies bill.

      • zako@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you install GrapheneOS, you do not need root, so GrapheneOS is in control of the phone not the user. The key here is if GrapheneOS is secure enough to be certified by Google Play Integrity API. is it security or other issue? perhaps Google is not supporter of FOSS ROMs, perhaps it is not fun of how GrapheneOS removes permissions to Google Apps, …

        If it is not security, this is a kind of monopoly to control which ROMs are allowed to run apps.

  • Fuck Yankies@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    So, uh, the next version of GrapheneOS will probably come with some Android OS version spoofing tech that solves this - if there isn’t something on F-Droid already.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      No it won’t. Or at least they said on BlueSky that if there had been a work around for this they would have solved it already.