• dink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I feel like it’s almost too generic to be useful. All the “standard” attachments make it a thing that already exists (and those things are usually much stable and supported). If they get enough 3rd party attention prior to launch, that could change.

    I wish they would have spent the time and effort just committing to the smartphone idea. Linux and the Linux community could greatly benefit from more open source smartphone devices.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I wonder who this is made for?

    The article calls it a “smartphone sized pocket computer”, but that describes smartphones too; they already are pocket computers. And they’ve had decades of design and development behind them.

    So… This device has a tiny touchscreen, and a keyboard, rather than having the whole thing being a touchscreen. So instead it has a modular bottom half… Which… Sounds like it’s trying to solve a problem that would’ve been a problem in like… The 90s, maybe, but has been solved by using… A touchscreen that can change the type of input it is flexibly, like smartphones do.

    It can’t call, like a smartphone, despite being a smartphone sized device. It has USB A 2.0 sockets and an Ethernet socket… Which makes it once again sound incredibly out-dated, like a device found in a time capsule, because USB C is smaller and faster than USB A 2.0, and can potentially be used for damn near anything. Which includes connecting to the Internet.

    Its battery looks very weak. Its CPU looks very weak. It has a tiny amount of RAM, and a tiny amount of storage. It is outclassed by any affordable, midrange smartphone, at nearly the same price too (if you avoid big brand names).

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Full-size usb, Ethernet and keyboard mean you can use it as a Linux computer, install arbitrary debian packages, run shell scripts, python scripts, and you don’t need any dongles. This is the differential factor. You can’t do the same on a smartphone, and it’s not supposed to be a smartphone. Why would you need a separate sim card when you can simply tether Internet from your phone?

      I get that this device isn’t for you, but there are people who don’t want to write and maintain apps through apps stores and simply want to copy simple scripts into a small device they can have with them. It’s a niche market and good for them for trying to fill that niche.

      I wonder what they use for charging port if not usb c…

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can do all that with USB C and a touch keyboard. There is no good reason under the sun to make a device that is this dated in concept.

        Whatever the market is they’re trying to fill, it’ll be so extremely niche that this product is already a failure. It’s not the first time some kind of ultra niche product from kickstarter failed before launch because except for a small handful even cared.

          • Mikina@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I can do that and more on my Pinephone running Kali Nethunter. While it’s mostly a gimmick with awfull battery life, I’ve already used it a few times mostly in regards to wifi pentesting for my cyber-sec job, i.e when going to lunch onsite and you notice a new wifi AP you didn’t see when inside the office you’re working on.

            And since it has an USB-C, I can simply plug in a dock with two USB-As, Ethernet, PD and HDMI, to turn it into a full-fledged Kali desktop.

              • Mikina@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I tried it like a year ago, maybe more, and it wasn’t ready for that. The battery life was awfull (which was a SW issue of the OS not being able to stand-by properly), and accepting calls wasn’t really reliable. It’s more of a gimmick and great as a side-phone, but I wouldn’t use it as a daily driver.

                But the situation might’ve changed.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can I just send you five years worth of „we’re sorry we’re behind schedule” messages and then ghost you instead? If so send me $159

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Why the fuck would a handheld need an ethernet port?

    The pro-linux developers just can’t stop designing things to their own specific needs and skillsets. No concept of designing & marketing for a wide audience.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The pro-linux developers just can’t stop designing things to their own specific needs and skillsets. No concept of designing & marketing for a wide audience.

      You mean the wide audience that’s already catered to by every other tech company?

    • FlappyBubble@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      How can this possibly present a problem? People with specific needs developing new hardware - seems like a great idea to me. I can definetly see a use for this sort of device for network people. It could function as a travel router when needed. Another more obacure use could be penetration testing. Just because you can’t imagine a use case doesn’t mean it’s useless.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I can absolutely think of use cases for it. Would 100% support an expansion port for it.

        But as a default feature on a mobile device? Moronic design choice. But again, just a classic out-of-touch decision from Linux developers. Very on-brand.

        • FlappyBubble@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          What do you think the obvious use case of the device ia then? It runs Linux, has pogo-ecpansion and is obviously niché as is. I would argue that it’s a device developed by Linux users/developers for Linux users/developers. In this case an Ethernet post is on brand as you said yourself. No matter if you think it’s “out of touch” or not, whatever you mean by that.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            And this thinking is exactly why it will always be niche. A complete inability & unwillingness to move beyond that.

            Might as well put a damn ham radio in it. The Linux crowd will love it, and everyone else won’t know what the hell to do with it. Seems what they’re going for.

  • Kajika@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    yet an other hardware from 10+ years ago. here we have an ARM Cortex-A53 from what it seems to be 2012. Maybe it is actually compatible with OpenGL 3…

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Our beloved consoles from the 80s and 90s were built with off the shelf parts, this is no different. Custom hardware in a niche market would lead nowhere.